Fight the cuts: re-elect a Democracy Alliance NEC

The events of the past year, with several members of other groups elected to the National Executive Committee, have clearly demonstrated that the “opponents” of Left Unity do not have an alternative strategy to beat the cuts and are unable to work with the left within the union to maximise unity amongst members. Below is a cogent explanation of all the things our NEC has fought for and achieved, with our support as members, over the past year.

Posted in Uncategorized

Left Unity would welcome the election of Jeremy Corbyn as PM

The National Committee of PCS Left Unity, elected every year by all members of Left Unity, have agreed the following statement on the General Election.

Statement from LUNC on the General Election

No To Austerity – No To The Tories

Left Unity is issuing this statement in response to the calling of an early general election. This announcement from Theresa May has surprised a lot of people given that she ruled it out only a few weeks ago. As socialists in PCS, we believe that this election gives us an opportunity to get rid of this vicious Tory government and for our union to effectively intervene in the election to put forward our anti-Austerity Alternative in the interests of our members and class.”

Theresa May’s pretext for calling an early election, is for the Tories to gain a clear mandate on their BREXIT strategy. This doesn’t fool anyone. No doubt the Tories will seek to ensure that BREXIT will dominate the election campaign. However, we must ensure that the issues important to PCS members and their families are raised at every opportunity. We have faced the brunt of attacks from this Governments austerity programme. This includes thousands of job cuts and redundancies, office closures, attacks on wages, pensions and terms and conditions.

PCS members have suffered the most prolonged squeeze on wages since the Civil Service was formed. Many of our members are also suffering as a result of the more generalised attacks on the welfare state. Benefits cuts are leaving millions unable to feed themselves and their families. The NHS are facing life-threatening cuts and further threats of large scale privatisation. The widespread use of zero hours contracts which are taking us back to the early days of the last century. The housing and education crises in working class communities are acute. All these need to be challenged in the lead up to the ballot on June 8th.

One of the first things that the Tories did after they were last elected was to introduce new ultra-draconian anti-trade union laws. These make it illegal to strike unless 50% vote in favour with at least a 50% turn-out – even though they themselves were only elected by 24% of the population. They are doing this to neutralise any effective opposition to the further attacks they are planning to both the welfare state and workers’ rights.

PCS Left Unity welcomed the election and re-election of Jeremy Corbyn on an anti-austerity programme. He has provided unwavering support to PCS campaigns over many years. In particular, he and his supporters, especially John McDonnell have stood with us on our central campaign for an alternative to austerity and an end to the cuts in pay, jobs and pensions.

It is vital that he launches an election campaign based on socialist policies. Central to that is opposing austerity and putting firmly back on the agenda the whole question of the re-building of the welfare state and the public sector, including re-nationalisation to ensure that workers and communities alike are protected. This is both a political choice and an economic necessity. PCS must ensure that the promises he has made to our members are delivered.

The election is also going to raise major issues for our members in the nations. There is thethe possibility of a second Independence Referendum in Scotland and a  greatly complicated political situation in Northern Ireland due to the suspension of the Assembly.

Immigration is another area that has already been raised by the right wing press as an issue. PCS will continue toto oppose all forms of racism and campaign for workers unity.

In this election PCS members should support those candidates who commit to policies which are aligned with those of the union, especially on the issue of austerity and its effects. Left Unity would therefore welcome the election of Jeremy Corbyn as Prime Minister of a Labour Government committed to anti-austerity policies.

Whatever the outcome of the general election it is important that we have a PCS leadership that is capable of facing  the challenges that face our union and its members.  It is vital to secure a Democracy Alliance victory with which to defend pay, jobs and services.and Left Unity urges everyone to work hard to achieve this.

Posted in Uncategorized

A personal message from PCS President, Janice Godrich

Janice Godrich, national president of PCS, writes to all members to urge them to vote in the national union elections and to re-elect her, to continue the fight with the government office – whether in the Cabinet Office or at Departmental level – to win gains for our members on pay, terms and conditions and our rights at work.

Posted in Elections

Vote Democracy Alliance in the 2017 NEC elections

There is one option in the NEC elections 2017, for members who want a democratic, fighting union, who want an experienced leadership that can build genuine campaigns, not just carp and make up slogans on the sidelines. That option is to vote for the Democracy Alliance.Vote Democracy Alliance in 2017

Posted in Uncategorized

PCS Pay Day Protests – smash the 1% cap

Every region of the country and every civil service department were represented yesterday in the PCS Pay Day protests. Those branches which put in the work to build attendance, saw scores of members turn out to show their desire to break the 1% pay cap.

It’s impossible to gather together all of the pictures. In Scotland alone, there were protests in Cumbernauld, Glasgow, Edinburgh, Musselburgh, Inverness, Aberdeen, Dundee, East Lothian and plenty of others, sometimes more than one protest, covering different departments.

What follows gives a flavour for the true spread of the protests, which were an inspiring reminder that we’re one PCS family and will fight on together.

It’s worth noting that HMRC treated the pay petition as industrial action and denied all facilities for the pay day protest, showing that the employers our members work for are still determined to smash the union wherever they can.

Janice Godrich, National President, and members of the NEC, lead the protest outside the Treasury in London.

Central protest in Glasgow, Buchanan St, addressed by DWP Greater Glasgow Chair, Charlie Liddle

Katrine Williams, NEC candidate and VP of DWP Group, leads a joint protest outside Welsh Gov’t Cardiff

The most remote pay day protests? Lochinver workers from Marine Scotland demand fair pay.

NEC member Zita Holbourne leads BIS London protests

Kevin McHugh, HMRC GEC and PCS Deputy President, with protesters at Benton Park View, deepest darkest North East

Darlington DBS staff voice their demand to break the cap.

Lawrence Dunne and Home Office & DBS staff join the protests on the Mersey

NEC member Candy Udwin sent in pictures from the protests of culture sector PCS members. This group is protesting outside the British Museum, London.

ACAS and BIS staff addressed by Nick Parker, former branch secretary of DWP Lincoln. Across the Midlands, workers turned out for pay day protests.

DWP Wirral, led by NEC member Martin Cavanagh, proudly rubbishing the claims that DWP workers can’t be involved with the pay day protests. Birkenhead Land Registry joined in the protests.

HMRC Edinburgh showing that across the civil service, across all major cities and departments, the campaign for fair pay must continue.

Steven Warwick from the national Young Members Committee and DEFRA members

NIPSA President Carmel Gates and General Council members join together to show solidarity with the PCS Pay Day protests from NI Civil Service staff. NIPSA and DWP Group have been working very closely together on Universal Credit.

HMRC Bathgate members are joined by Neil Findlay MSP, chair of the PCS parliamentary group in the Scottish parliament.

NEC member and DWP Group President Fran Heathcote pictured with Greater Manchester ARMs members, united behind PCS in seeking to break the pay cap.

Posted in Uncategorized

PCS Parliamentary Group keeps the political pressure on DWP

Left Unity members in Glasgow organised the city-wide meeting to oppose office closures. Similar meetings are being organised around the UK.

A third backbench debate has been secured by Chris Stephens MP, chair of the PCS Parliamentary group and MP for Glasgow South West. MPs in Glasgow reacted angrily against government plans to close half the Jobcentres in Glasgow and were thoroughly briefed by the PCS DWP Group Executive Committee (GEC) and by officers from the branches involved.

Across the UK, branches and the GEC are engaged in work with MPs to keep the political pressure on the government over the office closures that do not help claimants or staff, but will in fact harm the services DWP delivers and will potentially result in job losses for an estimated 750 DWP staff, according to the Minister.

Hansard’s record of the backbench debate on Thursday 16th March show that the many points being made by PCS – including against sanctions, against additional travel, against the loss of experienced staff, against the local economic impact of closures are all receiving close attention from MPs. And the government continues to have no answer.

Copied below are some excerpts from the debate. Barrow, Coatbridge, Alexandria, Cambuslang, Castlemilk, Langside and other sites all receive specific attention from MPs, and this is all good news. The PCS Left Unity-led GEC will continue to utilise every means at the disposal of the union to push the government back, in their narrow, austerity-driven office closures programme.


“The House is rightly exercised—as are many hon. Members—by the haphazard nature of the closures and the lack of evidence or rationale to support them, other than that they will save money in the short term. The lack of an adequate equality impact assessment is particularly damning. The closures have been presented by the Government as a straightforward process of rationalising the estate—that is, as sensible, considered and thought through in great detail. I would suggest otherwise, however. Far from this being a planned process to make the most of the expiry of contracts to improve services and locate them where they are needed most, it is a cost-cutting, penny-pinching cuts programme being done with poor to non-existent consideration of local conditions.” Chris Stephens, SNP, MP for Glasgow South West.

“For the record, we should remember that at least 30,000 people have lost their jobs in the civil service, and this is part of that. He spoke about the increasing workload. Citizens advice bureaus have reported that their workloads have gone up by 88%, in particular because of personal independence payment claims. Tile Hill jobcentre in my constituency is being closed, so people will have to walk miles or get buses. Importantly, a lot of them suffer from disabilities, so they will be at a disadvantage.” Jim Cunningham, Labour, MP for Coventry South

“Finally, I want to highlight the link between the push to digital services and office closures, when it becomes much more difficult to find a person to talk to in a public office. I have spoken recently about the unfair telephone tax, where the most vulnerable are hit with call charges for contacting the DWP and other government services. The DWP is a long way from being digital by default. A vicious circle is emerging, whereby access to advice and support is being blocked to those who need it most. Every Member here can testify that our offices are now providing more and more of that support through our constituency casework. Widespread jobcentre closures will only increase the workload on other staff in the DWP, giving them less time to spend on individuals.” Chris Stephens

“I was interested to read an article in the Evening Standard on 31 January by the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions about the disability unemployment rate in London, in which he wrote:

“The gap between the number of disabled people in work compared with the employment rate of non-disabled people in London is around 28 percentage points—a figure that is frankly unacceptable in 2017.”

“I agree with the Secretary of State about that, but it is a bit rich for him then to say:

“We’re building a locally-based system that works with businesses in the area and can offer people intense support”.

“I think that is a bit rich, because in London the DWP is proposing to close one in three jobcentres: 22 of the capital’s 73 existing jobcentres. Of the 22 that are closing, 15 are located in boroughs with a higher than average claimant count, and, as we know, London has a higher than average claimant count than the country as a whole. I am also concerned that the rate of unemployment among young people, the disabled and those from black and minority ethnic communities is higher in London than the national average. In fact, Office for National Statistics data from last September showed that BME unemployment in London stood at 9%. Ministers should review the criteria they use to determine the closures.” Heidi Alexander, Labour, MP for Lewisham East.

“One of the puzzling things about the closure programme is that the Government also want to increase the workload of jobcentres and want some people to go more frequently. They also want to introduce conditionality for people who are in work. It is difficult to see how those additional tasks can be managed at the same time as shutting down so many jobcentres.” Stephen Timms, Labour, MP for East Ham

“I fully appreciate the need for any Government to spend public funds wisely, but the decision to slash the number of jobcentres will most definitely have a negative impact on my constituents. The most obvious consideration is the additional travel costs that service users will face in getting to their appointments. This will barely register as small change for a UK Government Minister or indeed an MP, but it is an unwanted additional expense for someone already struggling on a low income. Constituents will also be burdened with increased travel times, which in turn puts them at an increased risk of being sanctioned under the DWP’s draconian and uncompromising rules. Again, the Minister may say, “It’s only three miles’ difference. What’s the big deal?” (…)

“A report from the Disability Benefits Consortium found that 93% of respondents to a survey of service users thought that the process for applying for PIP was stressful: 80% experienced difficulties in completing the claim form, while 82% felt that the application process had a negative impact on their health. Will Minister explain how closing one of my constituency’s two jobcentres will improve that experience for service users?” Ronnie Cowan, SNP, MP for Inverclyde 

“At least one thing can be said of the Department: it is consistent in its handling of the matter. Right from the start, it has been a shambles. As we have heard, after the news broke in the press that half Glasgow’s jobcentres were to be axed, it took seven hours for the Department to write to the affected MPs and inform us. It did not see fit to inform us or even consult us; nor did it bother to speak with the devolved Administration in Scotland. (…)

“I wonder whether the Minister knows, for instance, of the issues affecting Cambuslang in my constituency, where the Main Street jobcentre is due to close next year. Is the Department aware that Royal Bank of Scotland closed its doors there just months ago, that local traders have subsequently suffered a reported 30% drop in footfall, or that the two remaining banks, TSB and Clydesdale, have announced that they too are to close in the coming months? Has it considered at all the cumulative impact that those closures will have along with the closure of a major resource such as the jobcentre? I am guessing the answer to all of those questions is no. Perhaps if Ministers had bothered to consult me, they would be better informed. The Department will have seriously to make up for its former ignorance by consulting service users, local stakeholders—such as the local Church of Scotland minister Neil Glover, who has spoken out against the jobcentre closure and described it as a moral issue— and elected representatives, and by working with the Scottish Government. Scottish Employability and Training Minister Jamie Hepburn has written to and met Ministers from the Department, not only to express grave concerns but to seek clarity on the issue. He has requested that UK Ministers meet benefit recipients and others from the communities that will be affected by the proposals.” Margaret Ferrier, SNP, MP for Rutherglen and Hamilton

“As to digital interactions, the ward in which Eastern Avenue jobcentre is to close is one of the most deprived in the country; 74% of people there are in the 10% most deprived in the country. Many of them do not use the internet at all, let alone have the capacity to apply online—there are very high levels of digital exclusion. Ironically, the council is currently doing some work on digital inclusion, commissioned by the DWP, around Eastern Avenue jobcentre; that work will have to be halted. Again, there does not seem to have been any recognition or cognisance of the impact that the cuts will have on that work.

“Whether or not the estate is underutilised at Eastern Avenue—or indeed at Cavendish Court, where the Government are expecting claimants to move to—is open to question. I have been to both jobcentres and there certainly does not seem to be any underutilised space—Cavendish Court in particular is bursting at the seams—but we do not know, because the Government have not published any of the evidence and do not seem to have done any of the work behind it. I met the manager for my region, North, East Yorkshire and the Humber, after the Minister advised me that that was the best way to proceed. It was not her fault, but I am afraid the manager had absolutely nothing to add to what the Government had already published.” Louise Haigh, Labour, MP for Sheffield Heeley

“Coatbridge is a local DWP back office that employs about 250 people and is facing closure as a result of these cuts. I have been in contact with union representatives about the closure since the announcement was made and I recently attended the annual general meeting of the local branch of the Public and Commercial Services Union to discuss the impact of the closure on its members and on the local community. I was particularly concerned to be informed by the union that the DWP’s announcement was made without any consultation with the workers or the union at all. The DWP did not inform me of the lack of consultation when I was contacted about the closure. Although the DWP has stated that the closure will not involve any job losses, it has indicated that the jobs in question will be moved to alternate locations in central Glasgow or Motherwell, both of which are approximately half an hour’s drive away—and that is if we assume no traffic delays.

“Coatbridge is a community filled with young families. Many people base decisions about who they work for on the location of their potential workplace: they choose to work in locations that allow them to drop their children at school in the morning or be near an elderly or poorly relative. There is also the issue of additional travel costs for the predominantly local staff to and from Glasgow and Motherwell—again, colleagues have covered that well, so I will not repeat the points they made. For many workers affected by the cut, the loss of that essential proximity to home, the additional travel and the associated costs may mean that they need to seek alternative employment. I can hardly see how a Government can describe themselves as pro-family when they put so many in such a precarious position.

“The union members I spoke to were concerned about the dilution and inevitable reduction in the quality of services provided to service users that the cuts will cause, as was well articulated by my hon. Friend the Member for Inverclyde (Ronnie Cowan). The closure will affect not only current employees and their families but local businesses”. Philip Boswell, SNP, MP for Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill

“I was genuinely taken aback when I went to see the Minister and the civil servant who was there to support him did not even know what benefit was processed in Barrow. That is lacking in and of itself when we are talking about 80 people in my constituency who are losing their jobs. As the Minister for Employment, he will have some understanding that when skilled office jobs are eliminated in a geographically remote constituency such as Barrow, they have little prospect of being replaced by something else, and people cannot realistically travel to another place two or more hours away. (…)

“Due to the nature of the benefit, closing Phoenix House and taking the facilities somewhere else in the country, inevitably employing new people, will do damage to the service provided. The centre processes industrial injuries disablement benefit. The team say proudly that they have more than 100 years’ experience between them of processing that benefit. Due to that build-up of expertise, the Barrow team has taken part in a process that has reduced the processing time for that benefit from 175 days to 33 days. That is an achievement and welcome in itself, but we must also take into account who receives the benefit. It goes to people who have developed terrible conditions. Many of them, such as those suffering from the likes of asbestosis, are terminally ill due to negligence in past decades. That is why they have been given compensation in the form of the benefit. The whole point of focusing on driving down the time that it takes for them to get it is that it makes the difference between them receiving it while they are still alive and receiving it after they have died.” John Woodcock, Labour, MP for Barrow and Furness

“I also thank the PCS Scotland union for the excellent job that it has done assisting Members of Parliament throughout the country, and particularly in Glasgow, where we heard the rather unwelcome news just before Christmas that the Government intend to reduce the jobcentre estate by half, from 16 jobcentres to eight, two of which—the Castlemilk and Langside jobcentres—are in my constituency. (…)

I would ask the Minister why, despite several genuine and friendly invitations, he has not taken any time at all to visit any of the jobcentres in Glasgow that he wishes 207WH Jobcentre Plus Office Closures Jobcentre Plus Office Closures 16 MARCH 2017 208WH to close. I do not know what he thinks will happen to him if he comes, but I can assure him that either I or one of my hon. Friends from the city of Glasgow will look after him. He will be okay. Even at this late stage, I implore him to visit a jobcentre in Glasgow to hear what the staff and the users have to say.” Stewart Malcolm McDonald, SNP, MP for Glasgow South.

“[T]here are special circumstances that set the Alexandria jobcentre apart. The catchment area shares similar characteristics with others earmarked for closure. There are high levels of deprivation and unemployment, which, as in other urban areas, must be taken into consideration. The Alexandria jobcentre differs, in that it serves a population that is not only urban but suburban, in the true sense, and a rural community, which results in a set of unique challenges for those living in those communities, especially given that the area includes the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs national park boundary.

“An argument put forward by the DWP to support its proposal is that it is now easier to access jobcentre services, whether over the phone, online or in person. Let me take those in order. For citizens living in rural areas, the practical challenges are many. People whose line connections depend on weather conditions, which in my constituency are temperamental at best, do not have easy access to services by phone, as the Department argues. Given BT Openreach’s dubious record in elements of the rural sections of my constituency, there are difficulties in online connectivity.” Martin Docherty-Hughes, SNP, MP for West Dunbartonshire

“Many questions still need to be answered. The Government appear to believe that the current levels of employment and the introduction of universal credit mean that more than one in 10 Jobcentre Plus offices can be closed, regardless of the impact on the local community. According to House of Commons Library analysis, 33% of jobcentres in London, 18% of jobcentres in Scotland and 16% of jobcentres in the north-west will be lost at a time when communities are already under real pressure due to seven years of Tory austerity.

“Jobcentre Plus faces considerable challenges in the immediate future. From this April, it will play a much greater role in directly providing employment support when new referrals to the Work programme cease. From the end of this year, the Work programme and Work Choice will be replaced by the Work and Health programme. Most people claiming JSA are currently asked to take part in the Work programme, while Work Choice provides specialist employment support for disabled people.”

“More difficult journeys also increase the risk of claimants being sanctioned by staff for being late for or missing appointments. Will DWP issue guidance that, when considering sanctions, jobcentres should take account of increased journey times due to closures? There is already a backlog of sanctions, which in some cases is leading to money being withdrawn from claimants months after non-compliance, even though claimants may in the meantime have done what they were asked to do.” Margaret Greenwood, Labour, MP for Wirral West

Damian Hinds, as Minister for Employment, has a lengthy response which is included in the document linked to above.

Posted in Uncategorized

Left Unity has an organising record to be proud of, but much more to do

Marie (pictured, right) at the rally to save DWP Vinovium House, in Bishop Auckland, Saturday 18th March 2017

Marie McDonough, PCS DWP group organiser and DWP City of Sunderland branch Secretary writes.

Union organising is a key socialist principle that Left Unity is founded on and committed to.
2016 was a year when the Left Unity DWP Group has an organising record to be proud of but we are clear that there is still much more to do.

The backbone of organising is having trained reps in the office. The Left Unity GEC trained 160 new reps and 56 reps on personal cases.

There are now 1698 individual PCS reps in the DWP doing a job for the union and for members. Whilst this figure is very slightly down over the year, the key figure is that over 96% of members work in an office with a PCS rep to lead campaigns, tackle management and help members with problems.

To do their job our reps need information. The Left Unity led GEC has collected the personal data of over 80% of our reps and over 60% of our members so that we can get union information to them without relying on DWP email.

To be credible the union must reflect the diversity of the membership. Under the Left Unity led GEC for the first time ever, virtually 50% of PCS reps in the DWP are women. A figure replicated at group level by the election of our current GEC.

All of this good, sound organising work means that the DWP Group has been able to play a leading role in national campaigns on the CSCS and job cuts.

The Left Unity led DWP GEC is proud to have worked with Regional Organisers and branches to make our union well organised throughout 2016. The credit for much of this great organising must go to those regions and branches for working with the Left Unity GEC.

Despite these real achievements membership density has fallen after the end of check off to around 60% and this is where there is still much to do.

The Left Unity led GEC fully recognises and acknowledges the seriousness of the problem and has already taken plenty of steps to help branches recruit non-union members –

• We negotiated better rights for reps to recruit desk to desk for the first time.

• Branch briefings have been issued with recruitment materials

• A new hub has been put on the PCS website with recruitment and guidance

• Full Time Officials are being used to support branches

We are not complacent, we have been honest with branches about the problem and recruitment to PCS is now starting to pick up in early 2017.
Left Unity is clear that we have, and will continue, to provide help and support for branches but in the end recruitment can only be done on the ground in offices by our reps making it a priority.

Every branch and every rep must treat recruitment as their overriding priority. Personal cases are important but the real strength of the union comes from high membership density. There is much more to do, but by working together we can build our membership back up to the 70% that was common before the end of check-off.
Support Left Unity, Support a serious organising agenda that delivers for members and strengthens our union.

Posted in Uncategorized

DWP members are very much part of the National Pay Campaign

Martin Cavanagh on pay in DWP

DWP Vice President and NEC member Martin Cavanagh writes about how DWP members still have a battle to fight on pay, despite Employee Deal.

The DWP Left Unity leadership have been clear from day one of the Employee Deal, that our members would still play an important role in the National Pay Campaign launched by the National Executive Committee (NEC).

We have been clear at both NEC and Group Executive Committee (GEC) meetings that not only would this be the case, but that it was vitally important that members in DWP play an active part in the campaign, which will see a day of protest across the country this Friday (31st March).

Despite this unequivocal message our political opponents in Independent Left have cynically produced an article suggesting otherwise. They have claimed that a recent group circular “stops most of us from getting involved” and goes on to say “the vast bulk of members in the DWP will not be involved in the national pay campaign”. Not only is this cynical, leading members of IL were present at both NEC and GEC meetings when this was discussed, it is blatantly untrue and shows the lengths they will go to mislead our members into accepting their line.

A further group bulletin was issued today highlighting exactly why this important national campaign was very much a DWP issue and highlighted the reasons why all members in DWP should join in the protests this coming Friday and why branches should get involved.

Unlike the IL article, which solely criticises an earlier bulletin and does nothing to try and convince members of why they should participate, the LU leadership of the GEC has articulated exactly why we should all get behind the campaign. It is typical of IL to criticise rather than offer any ideas of their own, and shows contempt for our membership, who have always stood up and been counted when it matters.

The article repeats what the LU GEC stated last year, when we completed the widest ever direct consultation with the DWP membership, in highlighting the issues faced by those members who fared less well out of the Employee Deal, but significantly it fails to mention any of the real gains in pay our members received as a result of LU led negotiations. In reading their propaganda you could be forgiven for thinking the 15-20% increase in many members’ pay over four years, the return of real pay progression and the negotiated spot rate didn’t form part of the Collective Agreement.

Incredibly the IL article asks if the PCS DWP pay team will “recommend pulling out of the Employee Deal on the basis it doesn’t deliver the 1% plus to all members?” failing to address what would happen if that approach was taken. Left Unity are clear that had we failed to negotiate last year’s agreement the significant pay increases the majority of our members received, the introduction of a spot rate and the return of pay progression, would not have been achieved. We are equally clear that the 0.25% paid to members who chose to opt-out of the deal would have disappeared, with 0% a very real possibility.

The LU led GEC will not be withdrawing from the ED Collective agreement that members overwhelmingly voted for last year. Instead we will concentrate on campaigning to bring up the rates of pay for those who didn’t do as well out of the agreement and on fully implementing the terms of the Collective Agreement with regard to working patterns.

The Left Unity PCS pay negotiators have already used the terms of the Collective Agreement to raise the issues of pay for members who opted out, work in SLPZs or are on or near the max, who will suffer as a result of the recent rises in inflation.

Left Unity, unlike Independent Left, will not accept defeat and claim the national campaign is dead in our department. Instead we will continue to campaign on these issues for members and Friday 31st March is part of that campaign.

Equally we will not be so dismissive of the need to pursue decent increases for our members in grades SEO and above, which barely gets a mention in the article. Somewhat of a surprise given the IL DWP candidate for Group President is in fact an SEO.

Left Unity in DWP achieved a major breakthrough last year on pay, addressing the pay inequality with other government departments, but there is much more to be done. We must continue to both negotiate and campaign, with the aim of improving pay, breaking the Government pay cap and introducing pay progression for all our members. Until that is achieved activities like Friday’s protests are an integral part of our campaign strategy, and we are confident members will overlook the negativity of the IL argument and will join with tens of thousands of fellow Civil Servants this Friday in solidarity.

Posted in Uncategorized

PCS Left Unity says: Join the Pay Protest 31st March – say no to the pay cap

Break the 1% Pay cap

The Democracy Alliance-led NEC calls for all reps and members to get involved in the fight to break the cap

No wonder we are angry! Austerity and hardship for us – the highlife for the 1%.

George Osborne, ex-chancellor and architect in chief of the pay cap, has just been appointed editor of the London Evening Standard, salary unknown. He will remain as an MP pocketing £74,000 pa for this, £800,000 for 15 speeches, £650,000 for spending 1 day a week with an American bank, oh, and let’s not forget £40,000 from the family business. The picture for public sector workers could not be more different.

•​ The Independent think-tank (Resolution Foundation) says the wages of 5.4 million public sector workers are worth less now than in 2010 and if things carry on as they are that by the end of the decade wages will on average be £1700 lower than in 2010.
•​ PCS’s own independent research shows that civil servants’ average earnings have fallen by 8% and if things carry on as they are that by the end of the decadeaverage civil service pay will fall in value by 20%

These staggering statistics underline the reason as to why the pay cap must end and why PCS are entirely justified in submitting a claim for 2017 for a pay increase of 5% or £1200, whichever is the greater, a living wage of at least £10 per hour for all and the return to national bargaining for all staff in the civil service and related bodies.

The union needs to consider all options available to it including building co-ordinated action within and between groups and public bodies as part of a civil service wide campaign against the pay cap.

Our pay misery is shared by all public sector workers. Which is why PCS has called on the TUC to implement the policy agreed at its 2016 conference to back and coordinate action across public sector trade unions to bury the pay cap. This government did a U-turn on self-employed National Insurance increases. Action by unions across the public sector can achieve a similar result in abolishing the pay cap imposition.

On 31st March, get involved in pay protest action. Demonstrate our anger and determination to achieve justice on pay and break the pay cap.

Posted in Uncategorized

LU statement on state collusion against trade unionist activists

John Macreadie

John Macreadie, Terry Adams and other activists were hated by the Moderates in CPSA because they could organise members, campaign and win.


On Monday 13th March, The Morning Star newspaper led with an article entitled “Thatcher’s War on the Unions”, based on Cabinet Office papers released under the 30 year rule. The article details, how the Thatcher Government in collusion with Right Wing Union leaders plotted to overturn the election of John Macreadie as General Secretary of the Civil and Public services Association (CPSA) in 1986, forerunner of PCS. John was a supporter of Militant (now Socialist Party) and Broad Left (now Left Unity).

Left Unity members will be angered and outraged by these revelations. Scandalous about John Macreadie as they are, the likelihood is that he was not the only civil service union left activist to have been targeted in this way by security forces/government members. There is evidence of state interference in the running of free and independent trade unions.

Before the left won power in PCS, the CPSA national executive was controlled by the right wing “Moderate” faction.. The “Moderates” had proven links to the state, security services and big business, They maintained control by abusing democracy and colluded with the government in attacking left activists, including sackings and victimisations. The Moderates systematically misused the union machinery and worked with the right-wing press to run smear campaigns to attack the left in CPSA.

At the time, current PCS Ass Gen Sec, Chris Baugh, was named in The Sun newspaper along with John Macreadie and 4 others including Doreen Purvis one of our current Member Trustees, as dangerous subversives. Allegations were made by John Ellis, CPSA’s right-wing General  Secretary in a blatant attempt to encourage the government to move against John Macreadie who had been elected Dep Gen Sec, and  other named activists. The Broad Left had won control of the NEC in May 1987.

So, what else was the government up to and who else did they target? Cabinet papers released in 2014, again under the 30 year rule, revealed discussions between the Secret Service, Cabinet Secretary William Armstrong, and Ministers about how they might carry out a “purge” of CPSA left activists and supporters of the Militant.

What is of concern to us today is that these scandalous witch-hunting activities have almost certainly not ceased. The left will be targeted as we are committed to defending jobs, conditions and services as we argue for an alternative to the profit system. For example it was only in 2015 that union busting plans were leaked, referring to Left Unity and showing HMRC had targeted PCS and in particular its left activists with further evidence emerging that they were colluding with right wing activists in a failed attempt to set up the scab RCTU. We must continue to resolutely oppose such attacks.

We demand that an independent public enquiry set up to expose the extent of these outrages. It must identify those responsible, and the individual left activists affected including an assessment of the damage done to their careers. In the light of what we know about the police spying on trade union and political activists, as we saw at Orgreave and the massive blacklisting of trade unionists in the construction industry, we should work with other unions and PCS should seek co-participant status in the Pitchford inquiry. The time has come to open the secret anti-union files to public scrutiny. .

Left Unity stands for the right for trade unions to be run democratically by their members and free from interference from the state and the employer. We urge all members and activists to unite on this issue and reaffirm this right at our ADC in May.

Posted in Uncategorized